Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2010
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Paul Eric AspholmSammendrag
Presentation for approx 30 Russian journalists under The Bellona seminar at Bioforsk Svanhovd. Presentation of information on PERMASOM, phenolgy and biological phenomen.
Sammendrag
Rapporten gir en kunnskapsstatus om ulike norske naturtypers opptak og lagring av CO2 og deres sårbarhet for menneskelig aktivitet. Det totale karbonlageret i jordbruksareal, skog, myr og åpen fastmark er estimert til ca 4 milliarder tonn C, hvorav ca 11 % i vegetasjon og ca 89 % i jord. Skog har det største karbonlageret med ca 2 milliarder tonn C. Myr og åpen fastmark antas å inneholde ca 1 milliard tonn C hver og jordbruksreal ca 200 millioner tonn C. Netto karbonbinding kan bare påvises i skog. Myr og åpen fastmark er trolig i tilnærmet karbonbalanse, mens det sannsynligvis tapes karbon fra jordbruksareal. Karbon i myr antas å være mest sårbar for menneskelige inngrep.
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Jari Vauhkonen Liviu Ene Svein Solberg Marius Hauglin Vegard Lien Petteri Packalén Terje Gobakken Erik Næsset Timo Tokola Matti MaltamoSammendrag
The aim of this study was to validate and compare single-tree detection algorithms under different forest conditions. Field data and corresponding airborne laser scanning (ALS) data were acquired from boreal forests in Norway and Sweden, coniferous and broadleaved forests in Germany, and pulpwood plantations in Brazil. The data represented a variety of forest types from pure Eucalyptus stands with known ages and planting densities to conifer-dominated Scandinavian forests and more complex deciduous canopies in Central Europe. ALS data were acquired using different sensors with pulse densities varying between the data sets. Field data in varying extent were associated with each ALS data set for training purposes. Treetop positions were extracted using altogether six different algorithms developed in Finland, Germany, Norway and Sweden, and the accuracy of tree detection and height estimation was assessed. Furthermore, the weaknesses and strengths of the methods under different forest conditions were analyzed. The results showed that forest structure and density strongly affected the performance of all algorithms. The differences in performance between methods were more pronounced for tree detection than for height estimation. The algorithms showed a slightly better performance in the conditions for which they were developed, while some could be adapted by different parameterization according to training with local data. The results of this study may help guiding the choice of method under different conditions and may be of great value for future refinement of the single-tree detection algorithms.
Sammendrag
The airborne laser scanning (ALS) penetration rate, i.e. the ratio of ground echoes to total echoes, is a proxy for gap fraction. Hence, ALS has a potential for monitoring forest properties that are related to gap fraction, such as leaf area index, canopy cover and disturbance. Furthermore, two gap types may be distinguished: While a pulse that only produces a ground echo most likely hit a large, between-tree gap, a pulse that produces a ground echo as the last of several returns most likely hit smaller, within-canopy gaps. This may be utilized to distinguish between disturbance types such as defoliation and tree removal. However, the ALS penetration rate needs to be calibrated with gap fraction measurements in the field, because it is influenced by technical properties of the acquisition. The aim of this study was to quantify the magnitude of this influence, by comparing repeated acquisitions with different technical specifications. We had at hand 12 ALS acquisitions which could be combined into six pairs, from four spruce and pine dominated forests in Norway. We established 20x20 m grids, and for each grid cell we extracted three penetration variables: first echo penetration, last-of-many echo penetration, and total (i.e., first and last echo). We log-transformed the penetration variables (P1 and P2) from two laser acquisitions, and fitted the no-intercept, linear model log(P1) = log(P2), applying total least squares regression analysis. In a majority of the cases, the penetration variables were very similar, i.e. they deviated by <10%. For the first echo penetration the slopes varied from 0.87 to 1.07 and the R2 values ranged between 0.91 and 0.99. For the last-of-many echo penetration, there was generally weaker correspondence with slopes varying from 0.78 to 1.02, and R2 values ranging from 0.60 to 0.94. Finally, for the total penetration there was again stronger agreement with slopes in the range 0.83-1.03 and R2 values from 0.88 to 0.99. In conclusion, it seems that the penetration ability of different ALS scans in many cases are very similar, and further research may reveal ranges of standardized settings for which field inventory can be redundant.
Forfattere
Miguel D. Mahecha Markus Reichstein Martin Jung Sonia I. Seneviratne Sönke Zaehle Christian Beer Maarten C. Braakhekke Nuno Carvalhais Holger Lange Guerric Le Maire Eddy MoorsSammendrag
Terrestrial biosphere models are indispensable tools for analyzing the biosphere-atmosphere exchange of carbon and water. Evaluation of these models using site level observations scrutinizes our current understanding of biospheric responses to meteorological variables. Here we propose a novel model-data comparison strategy considering that CO2 and H2O exchanges fluctuate on a wide range of timescales. Decomposing simulated and observed time series into subsignals allows to quantify model performance as a function of frequency, and to localize model-data disagreement in time. This approach is illustrated using site level predictions from two models of different complexity, Organizing Carbon and Hydrology in Dynamic Ecosystems (ORCHIDEE) and Lund-Potsdam-Jena (LPJ), at four eddy covariance towers in different climates. Frequency-dependent errors reveal substantial model-data disagreement in seasonal-annual and high-frequency net CO2 fluxes. By localizing these errors in time we can trace these back, for example, to overestimations of seasonal-annual periodicities of ecosystem respiration during spring greenup and autumn in both models. In the same frequencies, systematic misrepresentations of CO2 uptake severely affect the performance of LPJ, which is a consequence of the parsimonious representation of phenology. ORCHIDEE shows pronounced model-data disagreements in the high-frequency fluctuations of evapotranspiration across the four sites. We highlight the advantages that our novel methodology offers for a rigorous model evaluation compared to classical model evaluation approaches. We propose that ongoing model development will benefit from considering model-data (dis)agreements in the time-frequency domain.
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag