Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2015
Forfattere
Lisa ParuchSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Hugo de Boer Hugh Cross Willem J.J.O. de Wilde Brigitta E.E. Duyfjes Barbara GravendeelSammendrag
The tropical cucurbitaceous genus Zehneria as traditionally circumscribed displays much morphological diversity. Recent taxonomic revisions have resulted in its redefinition through both recognition and subsequent lumping of several additional genera. This study utilized plastid and nuclear DNA sequence data to reconstruct a molecular phylogeny of Zehneria and its close relatives in order to test whether these revisions reflected the molecular evolution in this group. The results suggest that Neoachmandra is monophyletic, and that Zehneria in a restricted sense and Neoachmandra accessions form a single monophyletic clade, whereas Pilogyne in its present understanding is polyphyletic. In the light of these results Pilogyne should be merged back into Zehneria from which it was split off earlier.
Forfattere
John Marshall Bryden Keith HartSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Marco Ferretti Karin Hansen Vicent Calatayud Marta Camino-Serrano Nathalie Cools Bruno de Vos Tiina M. Nieminen Nenad Potocic Pasi Rautio Marcus Schaub Volkmar Timmermann Liisa Ukonmaanaho Peter WaldnerSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Foredrag – Monitoring for REDD+ with InSAR
Svein Solberg, Belachew Gizachew Zeleke, Erik Næsset, ...
Forfattere
Svein Solberg Belachew Gizachew Zeleke Erik Næsset Terje Gobakken Ole Martin Bollandsås Ernest William Mauya Håkan Olsson Rogers Ernerst Malimbwi Eliakimu ZahabuSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Svein Solberg Belachew Gizachew Zeleke Erik Næsset Terje Gobakken Ole Martin Bollandsås Eliakimu Zahabu Rogers Ernerst Malimbwi Håkan OlssonSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Svein SolbergSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Svein Solberg Belachew Gizachew Zeleke Erik Næsset Terje Gobakken Ole Martin Bollandsås Ernest William Mauya Håkan Olsson Rogers Malimbwi Eliakimu ZahabuSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Siv Aarnes Alexander Kopatz Hans Geir Eiken Julia Schregel Paul Eric Aspholm Tuomo Ollila Olga Makarova Natalia Polikarpova Vladimir Chizhov Sergey Ogurtcov Snorre HagenSammendrag
The trans-border brown bear population of Pasvik-Inari-Pechenga (Norway-Finland-Russia) has been monitored using genetic analyses of feces collection since 2005. In addition, in 2007 and 2011, hair traps were systematically placed out in the area to collect hairs for genetic analysis, to more precisely determine the minimum numbers of bears in the area. In 2015, we repeated this hair trap study, using the exact same methodology as in 2007 and 2011, to make a direct comparison of the results from all the 3 study years. Brown bear DNA was detected in 158 of 209 hair samples (76%) obtained from hair traps in 2015 and for 136 of these samples, a complete DNA profile could be determined. We identified 26 different bears in 2015, 17 females and 9 males. We detected 16 bears in Norway, 5 bears in Finland and 9 bears in Russia. Thirteen of these 26 bears were previously unknown, 7 were detected in Norway, 2 in Finland and 4 in Russia. A comparison to the results from 2007 and 2011 showed that we detected more bears in hair traps in 2015 (26 bears) than in 2007 (24 bears) and 2011 (20 bears). We observed an increase in the total yield of hair samples in the traps in 2015 (209 samples) compared to 2007 (196 samples) and 2011 (88 samples). Four (16%) and seven (35%) of the bears caught in hair traps in 2007 and in 2011, respectively, were also recaptured in 2015. Additional samples (scats and hair) collected opportunistically in the field within the Russian and Finnish parts of the study area in 2015 detected 4 male bears and 1 female bear in the Russian part leading to a total of 14 bears identified in Russia, of which 8 bears were detected for the first time. Additional scat and hair samples from the field in Norway were not included in our study and comparisons between the systematic hair-trapping and opportunistic sampling in the field were not performed. However, the results indicate that both methods combined are currently the optimal approach to monitor brown bear numbers in an area.
Forfattere
Agnethe ChristiansenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag