Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2023
Forfattere
Christian PedersenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Nina SvartedalSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Anita SønstebySammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Bjørn Arild Hatteland Sandra Kaasen Vestheim Jørund Johansen Maren Kristine Halvorsen Silje Maria Midthjell Høydal Stein Joar Hegland Joseph Chipperfield Markus A. K. Sydenham Anders NielsenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Raúl Ochoa-Hueso Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo Anita C. Risch Louise Ashton David Augustine Nicolas Bélanger Scott Bridgham Andrea J. Britton Viktor J. Bruckman J. Julio Camarero Gerard Cornelissen John A. Crawford Feike A. Dijkstra Amanda Diochon Stevan Earl James Edgerley Howard Epstein Andrew Felton Julien Fortier Daniel Gagnon Ken Greer Hannah M. Griffiths Caroline Halde Hans Martin Hanslin Lorna I. Harris Jeremy A. Hartsock Paul Hendrickson Knut Anders Hovstad Jia Hu Arun D. Jani Kelcy Kent Deirdre Kerdraon-Byrne Sat Darshan S. Khalsa Derrick Y. F. Lai France Lambert Jalene M. LaMontagne Stéphanie Lavergne Beth A. Lawrence Kim Littke Abigail C. Leeper Mark A. Licht Mark A. Liebig Joshua Lynn Janet E. Maclean Vegard Martinsen Marshall D. McDaniel Anne C. S. McIntosh Jessica R. Miesel Jim Miller Michael J. Mulvaney Gerardo Moreno Laura Newstead Robin J. Pakeman Jan Pergl Bradley D. Pinno Juan Piñeiro Kathleen Quigley Troy M. Radtke Paul Reed Víctor Rolo Jennifer Rudgers P. Michael Rutherford Emma J. Sayer Lilia Serrano-Grijalva Maria Strack Nicole Sukdeo Andy F. S. Taylor Benoit Truax Leonard J. S. Tsuji Natasja van Gestel Brenda M. Vaness Kevin Van Sundert Michaela Vítková Robert Weigel Meaghan J. Wilton Yuriko Yano Ewing Teen Eric BremerSammendrag
Understanding the chemical composition of our planet's crust was one of the biggest questions of the 20th century. More than 100 years later, we are still far from understanding the global patterns in the bioavailability and spatial coupling of elements in topsoils worldwide, despite their importance for the productivity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we measured the bioavailability and coupling of thirteen macro- and micronutrients and phytotoxic elements in topsoils (3–8 cm) from a range of terrestrial ecosystems across all continents (∼10,000 observations) and in response to global change manipulations (∼5,000 observations). For this, we incubated between 1 and 4 pairs of anionic and cationic exchange membranes per site for a mean period of 53 days. The most bioavailable elements (Ca, Mg, and K) were also amongst the most abundant in the crust. Patterns of bioavailability were biome-dependent and controlled by soil properties such as pH, organic matter content and texture, plant cover, and climate. However, global change simulations resulted in important alterations in the bioavailability of elements. Elements were highly coupled, and coupling was predictable by the atomic properties of elements, particularly mass, mass to charge ratio, and second ionization energy. Deviations from the predictable coupling-atomic mass relationship were attributed to global change and agriculture. Our work illustrates the tight links between the bioavailability and coupling of topsoil elements and environmental context, human activities, and atomic properties of elements, thus deeply enhancing our integrated understanding of the biogeochemical connections that underlie the productivity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world.
Forfattere
Kjersti Holt Hanssen Viktor J. Bruckman Michael Gundale Aigars Indriksons Morten Ingerslev Marju Kaivapalu Dagnija Lazdina Kristaps Makovskis Adam O’Toole Katri Ots Marjo Palviainen Jogeir N. Stokland Iveta Varnagiryte-KabasinskieneSammendrag
This report summarizes the status of biochar in forestry in the Nordic-Baltic countries today. Biochar is charred material formed by pyrolysis of organic materials. In addition to improving soil physical and chemical properties and plant growth, biochar is a promising negative emission technology for storing carbon (C) in soils. The report gives an overview of current and potential uses, production methods and facilities, legislation, current and future research as well as biochar properties and effects. Forests are both a source of feedstock for biochar production and a potential beneficiary for biochar use. Production is still limited in the Nordic-Baltic countries, but commercial production is on the rise and several enterprises are in the planning or start-up phase. In this report different biochar production technologies are described. As the (modern) use of biochar for agricultural and especially forestry purposes is relatively new, in many countries there are no specific legislation regulating its use. Sometimes the use of biochar is regulated through more general laws and regulations on e.g. fertilizers or soil amendment. However, both inside and outside EU several documents and standards exist, listing recommended physical and chemical limit values for biochar. So far, most biochar studies have been conducted on agricultural soils, though research in the forestry sector is starting to emerge. The first biochar field experiments in boreal forests support that wood biochar promotes tree growth. Also, studies on the use of biochar as an additive to the growing medium in tree nurseries show promising results. Because biochar C content is high, it is recalcitrant to decomposition, and application rates to soil can be high, biochar is a promising tool to enhance the C sequestration in boreal forests. However, available biomass and production costs may be barriers for the climate change mitigation potential of biochar. When it comes to effects on biodiversity, few field-based studies have been carried out. Some studies from the Nordic region show that biochar addition may affect microbial soil communities and vegetation, at least on a short time scale. There is clearly a need for more research on the effects of biochar in forestry in the Nordic-Baltic region. Long-term effects of biochar on e.g., forest growth, biodiversity, soil carbon and climate change mitigation potential should be studied in existing and new field experiments.