Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2017
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Mirzaman Zamanzadeh Live Heldal Hagen Kine Svensson Roar Linjordet Svein Jarle HornSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Several mathematical models have been proposed for describing particle‐size distribution (PSD) data, but their characteristics and accuracy have not been investigated for the < 0.002, 0.002–0.05 and 0.05–2.0‐mm fractions separately. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to examine the characteristics of various PSD models and to evaluate the accuracy of fitting to the entire PSD curve and to each of the three fractions separately. Thirty‐six PSD models were fitted to the experimental data of 160 soil samples from Iran. The beerkan estimation of soil transfer (BEST), Fredlund unimodal and bimodal, two‐ and three‐parameter Weibull, Rosin–Rammler and van Genuchten models provided the best fit to the experimental data of the three size fractions above, but with a different order of performance for the different fractions. For all textural fractions, the following models performed substantially less well than the other models: the offset‐non‐renormalized lognormal, simple lognormal, S‐curve, Schuhmann, Yang, Turcotte and Gompertz models. A comparison of the overall accuracy and simplicity of the models indicated that the BEST, two‐ and three‐parameter Weibull and Rosin–Rammler models provided the best fit to the experimental data for the entire curve, which is similar but does not correspond fully to the findings of a similar, earlier study. We found that the number of model parameters and the type of equation did not explain the models' fitting capabilities. We also found that the iterated function system (IFS) model performed better than the PSD models for all fractions. Comprehensive comparisons of PSD models will be of value to future model users, but it is important to note that such comparisons will remain dataset dependent. This is likely to continue until they are tested on a near‐infinite synthetic dataset that covers all possible data options.
Forfattere
Ingun Tryland Trond Mæhlum Aina Charlotte Wennberg Adam Paruch Rebekka Krystad Lisa Paruch Sissel Brit Ranneklev Therese Fosholt Moe Sigrid Haande Mette Myrmel Lucy Robertson Tharan Fergus Anna-Lena Beschorner Julia KvitsjøenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Martina Zelenakova Daniel Constantin Diaconu Ketil HaarstadSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Diego Faustolo Alves Bispo Marx Leandro Naves Silva Joao Jose Granate de Sa e Melo Marques Marianne Bechmann Pedro Velloso Gomes Batista Nilton CuriSammendrag
Phosphorus transfer at a small catchment in southeastern Brazil: distributed modelling in different land use scenarios
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Sigmund Hågvar Mikael Ohlson Daniel FløSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag