Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2013
Sammendrag
Bark beetles cause widespread damages in the coniferous-dominated forests of central Europe and North America. In the future, areas affected by bark beetles may further increase due to climate change. However, the early detection of the bark beetle green attack can guide management decisions to prevent larger damages. For this reason, a field-based bark beetle monitoring program is currently implemented in Germany. The combination of remote sensing and field data may help minimizing the reaction time and reducing costs of monitoring programs covering large forested areas. In this case study, RapidEye and TerraSAR-X data were analyzed separately and in combination to detect bark beetle green attack. The remote sensing data were acquired in May 2009 for a study site in south-west Germany. In order to distinguish healthy areas and areas affected by bark beetle green attack, three statistical approaches were compared: generalized linear models (GLM), maximum entropy (ME) and random forest (RF). The spatial scale (minimum mapping unit) was 78.5 m2. TerraSAR-X data resulted in fair classification accuracy with a cross-validated Cohen’s Kappa Coefficient (kappa) of 0.23. RapidEye data resulted in moderate classification accuracy with a kappa of 0.51. The highest classification accuracy was obtained by combining the TerraSAR-X and RapidEye data, resulting in a kappa of 0.74. The accuracy of ME models was considerably higher than the accuracy of GLM and RF models.
Forfattere
Belachew Asalf TadesseSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Christian PedersenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Trygve S. Aamlid Siri Fjellheim Abdelhameed Elameen Sonja Klemsdal Kristin Daugstad Hans Martin Hanslin Knut Hovstad Dagmar Hagen Knut Rydgren Line RosefSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
John A. Finn Laura Kirwan John Connolly Maria Teresa Sebastia Aslaug Helgadottir Ole Hans Baadshaug Gilles Bélanger Alistair Black Caroline Brophy Rosemary P. Collins Jure Cop Sigridur Dalmannsdottir Ignacio Delgado Anjo Elgersma Michael Fothergill Bodil Frankow-Lindberg An Ghesquiere Barbara Golinska Piotr Golinski Philippe Grieu Anne-Maj Gustavsson Mats Höglind Olivier Huguenin-Elie Marit Jørgensen Zydre Kadziuliene Päivi Kurki Rosa Llurba Tor Lunnan Claudio Porqueddu Matthias Suter Ulrich Thumm Andreas LüscherSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Dominika Srednicka-Tober Marcin Baranski Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska Krystyna Skwarlo-Sonta Ewa Rembialkowska Jana Hajslova Vera Schulzova Ismail Cakmak Levent Ozturk Tomasz Krolikowski Katarzyna Wisniewska Ewelina Hallmann Elzbieta Baca Mick Eyre Håvard Steinshamn Teresa Jordon Carlo LeifertSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Sissel Hansen Randi Berland Frøseth Anne Kjersti Bakken Hugh Riley Kristian Thorup-Kristensen Marina Azzaroli BlekenSammendrag
Implications Mulching of GM herbage can increase cereal yields compared to its removal. However, the same GM herbage removed for biogas production will provide biogas residue that can be used as spring fertilizer to cereals. This will improve N-recovery and reduce the risk for N pollution. Cooperation with existing biogas plants will be more efficient, as building small biogas plants are costly and challenging.
Forfattere
Sissel Hansen Randi Berland Frøseth Anne Kjersti Bakken Hugh Riley Kristian Thorup-Kristensen Marina Azzaroli BlekenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag