Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2001
Forfattere
Bjørn TveiteSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Lars Sandved DalenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Utgangspunktet bør hele tiden være å opprettholde trevirkets konkurransekraft og mangslungne mulighet til å bidra til vår menneskelige utfoldelse og trivsel.
Forfattere
Per Otto Flæte Bohumil Kucera Erlend Ystrøm HaartveitSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Bernt-Håvard Øyen Sigbjørn ØenSammendrag
Volumtilvekstfunksjoner for treslagene gran, sitkagran, furu, lerk, hemlokk og edelgran plantet i Vest-Norge er presentert.
Forfattere
Stig LandeSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Bjørn ØklandSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Svein Ola MoumSammendrag
Fylkesmannen har ansvar for å utarbeide hovedplan for skogbruksplanleggingen i fylket.Hovedplanen skal være det strategiske styringsverktøyet for skogbruksplanleggingen. Planeneskal angi en grov skisse for framdrift og årlig planleggingsomfang i den nærmeste 10-15-årsperioden, samt et konkret handlingsprogram for skogbruksplanleggingen i de nærmeste 3-4 år. Et noe mer samordnet opplegg for hovedplanene vil gi bedre oversikt over de ulike fylkers strategier og ambisjonsnivå framover, og vil være nyttig bakgrunn for vurdering av tilskuddsbehovet det enkelte år og tilskuddsfordelingen mellom fylker. NIJOS har høsten 2000 arbeidet fram en ”mal” eller en veiledning for arbeidet med hovedplanen. Vi vil gjerne ha tilbakemelding på malen fortløpende, slik at den kan forbedres og oppdateres etter behov.Denne malen og de forslag til innhold som framkommer, er etter NIJOS sin vurdering det minimum av informasjon som er nødvendig i en hovedplan. Lokale behov kan gjøre at planen i praksis blir mer omfattende. Innholdet skal utformes med tanke på fri distribusjon til alle interesserte.
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Aksel GranhusSammendrag
The risk of logging damage to residual trees (height >3.0 m) and advance regeneration saplings (height 0.5–3.0 m) was evaluated after mechanized (single-grip harvesters + forwarders) and motor-manual (chain saw + skidding) selection harvesting in studies I and II. Harvesting took place during the winter season. Mechanized harvesting caused the highest injury rates, and the difference was highest at high cutting intensity in densely stocked stands. Another important difference between the two operating methods was the spatial distribution of the injury risk relative to striproads. The most important injuries on the larger (>3.0 m) trees were stem- and root wounds, and loss of branches. Wounds tended to be larger, and crown injuries more serious, after mechanized harvesting, but differences were not statistically significant. The most frequent injuries on saplings were crown injuries (loss of branches, stem breakage) and stem lean. In motor-manually harvested stands saplings without pre-harvest deformities in the form of top- or leader defects were more prone to damage than saplings with such defects. A similar difference was not found in stands subjected to mechanized harvesting. This result was attributed to the different work patterns during felling and processing with the two operating methods, in combination with the spatial distribution of saplings of different quality relative to larger trees and stand openings. In study III sapling mortality, and recovery from logging damage in a five-year period after selection harvesting, was investigated. Mortality on the different plots (n=11) was highly variable. For saplings without previous logging damage mortality was related to pre-harvest vigour, and increased with increasing cutting intensity in the immediate surrounding of the sapling. Unspecified site factors also contributed to explain the probability of mortality. Saplings that had been pushed over during harvesting often survived and recovered, while injuries to the crown led to poor survival. Crown injuries were most common on plots subjected to mechanized harvesting, while stem lean was correspondingly important on motor-manually harvested plots. Whether this pattern was attributed to differences in temperature at the time of harvesting (winter), or operating method, is uncertain. In study IV advance regeneration responses in terms of height growth, needle dry weights, and foliar nutrient concentrations were compared after three different release treatments: untouched control, selection harvesting with 50-60 % removal of basal area (BA50-60), and patch cut (25x25 m - 0.063 ha clear-cut). The foliar analyses were carried out five years after treatment, and included dominant and co-dominant (overstorey) trees on control and BA50-60 plots. Height growth and needle dry weights of saplings generally increased with increasing overstorey removal. The growth response was explained by an interaction of foliar nitrogen concentration in current (C) and one-year-old (C+1) needles, and degree of overstorey removal. The foliar analyses did, however, not confirm improved N status after cutting. Increasing overstorey removal led to a reduction of K (C), Mg (C+1) and B (C, C+1) in saplings. A parallel decline of B (C+1) occurred in the overstorey trees (BA50-60). Saplings on control plots had higher concentrations of K and Cu in C-needles, relative to overstorey trees. The influence of neighbour tree basal area on sapling height growth and presence of natural defects (top- and leader damage) was examined in study V. The three stands selected for the study had not been subjected to cutting for several decades, and basal areas ranged from 25–33 m2 ha-1. The relationship between growth and four basal area variables was evaluated: basal area (m2 ha-1) of taller (>3.0 m) neighbour trees within 2.82, 3.99 and 5.64 m radius from the sapling (25, 50 and 100 m2 circular plots), and basal area (m2) of trees within 5.64 m radius weighted according to distance from the sapling. A reduction of growth attributed to increasing basal area of neighbour trees was only observed for the tallest saplings (2.1-3.0 m). Between 33 and 42 % of the saplings had leader- or top defects, and damage frequencies increased with declining distance to the nearest taller neighbour tree.