Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2023
Authors
Vibeke Lind Angela Dagmar Schwarm Marcello Mele Alice Cappucci Giulia Foggi Özge Sizmaz Eleni Tsiplakou Alberto Stanislao Atzori Joni Van Mullem Nico PeirenAbstract
The aim of this chapter is to summarize dietary measures to mitigate methane at animal level. The chapter briefly summarizes methane measurement techniques. The focus is on the mitigation potential studied in vivo, but when such data were not available, in vitro measurements were included. The chapter covers main dietary ingredients such as forage quality, inclusion of concentrate, grazing management and inclusion of primary (e.g. lipids) and secondary (e.g. tannins) plant compounds as well as chemical inhibitors (e.g. 3-NOP) to the diet. This chapter can be used as a guidance on what to use, at which concentrations in the diets levels (farmers) and how to quantify the effect (researchers).
Authors
Antje Gonera Anna Birgitte Milford Katja-Maria Prexl Jonathan Romm Ingunn Berget Paula VarelaAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
May Bente Brurberg Anupam Gogoi Bikal Ghimire Erik Lysøe Mandeep Poudel Håvard Eikemo Jahn Davik Arne StensvandAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Tomasz Leszek WoznickiAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Clemens Blattert Mikko Mönkkönen Daniel Burgas Fulvio Di Fulvio Astor Toraño Caicoya Marta Vergarechea Julian Klein Markus Hartikainen Clara Antón Fernandéz Rasmus Astrup Michael Emmerich Nicklas Forsell Jani Lukkarinen Johanna Lundström Samuli Pitzén Werner Poschenrieder Eeva Primmer Tord Snäll Kyle EyvindsonAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Helge BerglannAbstract
This article considers the use of convex taxation as an instrument to regulate fisheries, comparing it with linear taxation with regards to economic yields and the risk of resource depletion. Convex taxation is shown to be central in studies with static models but has rarely been explored in the context of dynamic fisheries. Literature shows that a linear tax regime is superior to quantity regulation when the stock estimate is uncertain in terms of economic gains and its ability to prevent resource extinction. Furthermore, when cost uncertainty is involved, a strictly convex tax on landings can prove even more efficient. A numerical example with a single-species demersal fishery having both ecological and economic uncertainty demonstrates the gain in value of moving from a linear to a strictly convex tax.
Authors
Astor Toraño Caicoya Werner Poschenrieder Clemens Blattert Kyle Eyvindson Markus Hartikainen Daniel Burgas Mikko Mönkkönen Enno Uhl Marta Vergarechea Hans PretzschAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
El Houssein Chouaib HarikAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Yarkın Akyüz Havva Ece Salali Pelin Atakan Cihat Günden Murat Yercan Lampros Lamprinakis Signe Kårstad Irina Solovieva Nadja Kasperczyk Konstadinos Mattas Dimitra Lazaridou Gizem Yener Ahmed Alayidi Ilia Kunchulia Lado Basilidze Marija KnezAbstract
No abstract has been registered