Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2013
Authors
Jørund RolstadAbstract
Environmentalists tell us that we’re loosing species at an increasing rate, and if we are to stop the cascading extinctions by 2020 (which we have agreed upon in international conventions) we need to take immediate action. Making sure we’re not loosing any ’native’ species may seem a daunting task, especially if we look at insects, spiders, fungi, and other tiny creatures that live in dead wood. For thousands of these saproxylic species the wood and timber that we are harvesting make up the bread and butter of their everyday life. The competition is fierce, and it doesn’t get any better when we remove most of the wood that otherwise would have become their future homes. What shall we do?
Authors
Gunda ThömingAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
The relative volume growth effects of thinning after whole-tree harvesting (WTH) compared to a conventional stem-only harvest (CH) in young stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) were analyzed, using a series of four pine and four spruce field experiments. The series was established in the years 1972–1977, and thinning was performed only once. Results are shown periodically and cumulatively. All sites were included for 20 (19) years in pine and 25 years in spruce. The total experimental period varied between 19 and 35 years for individual sites. Four models assuming additive or multiplicative effects gave only slightly varying results. The inclusion of standing volume after thinning as a covariate was effective in spruce independent of whether the covariate was treated as multiplicative or additive. A logarithmic model with a multiplicative effect of the covariate was preferred in further presentations. Results for pine stands after 20 years indicated a nonsignificant loss of 5% with confidence limits (p = 0.05) of ±6–7%, while the spruce stands showed a significant growth loss of 11% with confidence limits of ±4–5% after 25 years. The difference between the species in relative growth effects was significant, and amounted to 8% for a cumulative 20-year period. No indications of trends in response were found during a 20-year period in pine and a 25-year period in spruce. An analysis of growth effects in the first years showed that basal area increment in spruce was significantly reduced already in the first growing season after thinning.
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Matthias KoeslingAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Sabine Rosner Jan Svetlik Kjell Andreassen Isabella Børja Lise Dalsgaard R Evans B Karlsson Mari Mette Tollefsrud Svein SolbergAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered