Hopp til hovedinnholdet

Publications

NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.

2013

To document

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To grow remontant strawberries at high latitudes in autumn is challenging because of short days and low light levels. Nevertheless, current day and night temperatures in Norwegian coastal areas up to 63 degrees N are normally sufficient for growth and fruit development till early October, and even higher temperatures can be expected in the future according to climatic scenarios, with potential to prolong the growing season. However, light would be a minimum factor. It is therefore of interest to examine the effects of providing supplemental light when photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) falls below critical level for development of high fruit quality. OBJECTIVE: To examine effects on fruit yield parameters, fruit tension, Brix° and arthropod numbers, in order to investigate the potential of LED lighting using diodes giving red and blue light, as a means to prolong the growing season at northern latitudes. METHOD: In this two-year study remontant strawberry cvs ‘Everest’ and ‘Rondo’ were grown in high polytunnels. Two LED lighting levels (LED100 and LED300) were applied from 7 Pm to 7 AM, whenever light intensity fell below 400 μmol m−2 s−1 from first week of September, and compared to ambient light (control). The LED300 was peaking at wavelengths of 460 nm and 660 nm, respectively blue and red, and the relation between blue and red light was 1 : 8; LED100 delivered similar wavelengths but the blue to red relation was 2 : 8. Fruit yield, soluble solids (Brix°), fruit firmness, temperature (°C), dew point (°C), and PAR light (μmol m−2 s−1) were recorded. The experimental design was block with four replications. The lamps were hung with the light source 40 cm above top of canopy, giving a PAR radiation at top of canopy of LED100 and LED300 of respectively 900 and 258 μmol m−2 s−1. RESULTS: LED improved fruit yield and quality, but more at 900 than at 258 μmol m−2 s−1. However, highest light level was probably beyond the saturation point for photosynthesis, at least in early morning and late evening and the last three weeks of the harvesting season, because of low temperatures. Some fruit yield was not harvested because of too low temperatures to achieve ripen fruits after mid-October. Arthropods were sampled from ‘Rondo’ leaves 2–3 times per season, and aphids, spider mites and predatory mites (introduced) were the most numerous groups. LED significantly decreased the number of spider mites in the autumn. CONCLUSIONS: LED lighting has potential as light source growing remontant strawberries in high polytunnels, when PAR radiation is below 400 μmol m−2 s−1. However, to benefit fully of the light it would be necessary to grow the plants in winter tunnels and add heating. That would increase the yields significantly compared with our results.

Abstract

Crop load adjustments in European plum trees (Prunus domestica L.) require thinning either by hand (mechanical) or chemical means to achieve marketable size, fruit quality and to overcome alternate bearing. Efficient tools for crop load management are highly desirable, since only a few chemical thinners are registered and hand thinning is labor intensive and costly. Gibberellic acid (GA3) was tested as a novel approach to regulate the crop load of the plum cultivar ‛Opal’ at Ullensvang, western Norway. The objective was to reduce flower bud induction in the “off-year” thus adjusting crop load the subsequent year. In 2008, an “off-year”, GA3 was applied to 9 year-old ‘Opal’ trees as a high volume spray to the point of run-off at 50 ppm or 100 ppm at either 5 weeks after full bloom or 10 weeks after full bloom, or on both dates and compared with untreated control trees. Trees were unthinned the first year but then thinned to commercial standard the following year. In the year of application, total yield was recorded and fruit quality evaluated. Return bloom, fruit set, yield and fruit quality were assessed the subsequent year. In general, there were no significant differences in crop load of all treated trees compared to untreated trees in the year of application (non-target crop) however, fruit weight increased slightly on those trees when GA3 was applied 5 weeks after full bloom compared to all other treatments and untreated trees. The following year (target crop) fruit set was significantly reduced for all GA3 treatments. The most effective application time was 5 weeks after full bloom. Before thinning, initial fruit set was greatest on untreated trees as well as on those trees treated with GA3 10 weeks after full bloom. Fruit weight and fruit colour were significantly better on trees with the least fruit set. GA3 applications had no effect on fruit firmness. It is concluded that GA3 is an effective tool for inhibiting flower bud induction in an “off-year” thus enabling crop load management the subsequent “on-year”.