Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2018
Authors
Robert Jankowiak Agnieszka Ostafińska Truls Aas Halvor Solheim Piotr Bilański Riikka Linnakoski Georg HausnerAbstract
Species of Leptographium are characterized by mononematous or synnematous conidiophores and are commonly associated with different arthropods. Some of them also produce a sexual state characterised by globose ascomata with elongated necks. Compared to investigations on coniferous trees, the occurrence of Leptographium species on hardwood trees has been poorly studied in Europe. During a survey of ophiostomatoid fungi on various hardwood tree species in Norway and Poland, three unusual species, which fit in the broader morphological description of Leptographium spp., were found in association with Trypodendron domesticum, Trypodendron signatum and Dryocoetes alni, and from wounds on a variety of hardwoods. Phylogenetic analyses of sequence data for six different loci (ITS1–5.8 S–ITS2, ITS2-LSU, ACT, b-tubulin, CAL, and TEF-1a) showed that these Leptographium species are phylogenetically closely related to the species of the Grosmannia olivacea complex. The first species forms a well-supported lineage that includes Ophiostoma brevicolle, while the two other new taxa resided in a separate lineage; possibly affiliated with Grosmannia francke-grosmanniae. All the new species produce perithecia with necks terminating in ostiolar hyphae and orange-section shaped ascospores with cucullate, gelatinous sheaths. These species also produce dark olivaceous mononematous asexual states in culture. In addition, two of the newly described species have a second type of conidiophore with a short and non-pigmented stipe. The new Leptographium species can be easily distinguished from each other by their appearance and growth in culture. Based on novel morphological characters and distinct DNA sequences, these fungi were recognised as new taxa for which the names Leptographium tardum sp. nov., Leptographium vulnerum sp. nov., and Leptographium flavum sp. nov. are provided.
Authors
Marcos Viejo K Slågedal Elena Carneros Igor A. Yakovlev Carl Gunnar Fossdal Jorunn Elisabeth OlsenAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Annette Dathe Attila Nemes Esther Bloem Matthew Patterson Perrine Marguerite Fernandez Helen French Daniel GiminezAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Matthias Buchecker Sebastian Eiter Dina Stober Monika Suškevičs Cheryl de Boer Berthe JongejanAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Mélanie Harzé Arnaud Monty Sylvain Boisson Carline Pitz Julia-Maria Hermann Johannes Kollmann Grégory MahyAbstract
Persistence of restored populations depends on growth, reproduction, dispersal, local adaptation, and a suitable landscape pattern to foster metapopulation dynamics. Although the negative effects of habitat fragmentation on plant population dynamics are well understood, particularly in grasslands, the population traits that control grassland restoration are less known. We reviewed the use of population traits for evaluating grassland restoration success based on 141 publications (1986–2015). The results demonstrated that population demography was relatively well‐assessed but detailed studies providing information on key stages of the life cycle were lacking despite their importance in determining population viability. Vegetative and generative performances have been thoroughly investigated, notably the components of plant fitness, such as reproductive output, while genetic and spatial population structures were largely ignored. More work on the population effects of ecological restoration would be welcomed, particularly with a focus on population genetics. Targeted species were principally common and dominant natives, or invasive plants while rare or threatened species were poorly considered. Evaluation of ecological restoration should be conducted at different scales of ecological complexity, but so far, communities and ecosystems are over represented, and more focus should be directed towards a population approach as population traits are essential indicators of restoration success.
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Daniela Franz Manuel Acosta Nuria Altimir Nicola Arriga Dominique Arrouays Marc Aubinet Mika Aurela Edward Ayres Ana López-Ballesteros Mireille Barbaste Daniel Berveiller Sébastien Biraud Hakima Boukir Timothy Brown Christian Brümmer Nina Buchmann George Burba Arnaud Carrara Allessandro Cescatti Eric Ceschia Robert Clement Edoardo Cremonese Patrick Crill Eva Darenova Sigrid Dengel Petra D'Odorico Gianluca Filippa Stefan Fleck Gerardo Fratini Roland Fuß Bert Gielen Sébastien Gogo John Grace Alexander Graf Achim Grelle Patrick Gross Thomas Grünwald Sami Haapanala Markus Hehn Bernard Heinesch Jouni Heiskanen Mathias Herbst Christine Herschlein Lukas Hörtnagl Koen Hufkens Andreas Ibrom Claudy Jolivet Lilian Joly Michael Jones Ralf Kiese Leif Klemedtsson Natascha Kljun Katja Klumpp Pasi Kolari Olaf Kolle Andrew Kowalski Werner Kutsch Tuomas Laurila Anne de Ligne Sune Linder Anders Lindroth Annalea Lohila Bernhard Longdoz Ivan Mammarella Tanguy Manise Sara Maraňón Jiménez Giorgio Matteucci Matthias Mauder Philip Meier Lutz Merbold Simone Mereu Stefan Metzger Mirco Migliavacca Meelis Mölder Leonardo Montagnani Christine Moureaux David Nelson Eiko Nemitz Giacomo Nicolini Mats B. Nilsson Maarten op de Beeck Bruce Osborne Mikaell Ottosson Löfvenius Marian Pavelka Matthias Peichl Olli Peltola Mari Pihlatie Andrea Pitacco Radek Pokorny Jukka Pumpanen Céline Ratié Corinna Rebmann Marilyn Roland Simone Sabbatini Nicolas P.A. Saby Matthew Saunders Hans Peter Schmid Marion Schrumpf Pavel Sedlák Penelope Serrano Ortiz Lukas Siebicke Ladislav Šigut Hanna Marika Silvennoinen Guillaume Simioni Ute Skiba Oliver Sonnentag Kamel Soudani Patrice Soulé Rainer Steinbrecher Tiphaine Tallec Anne Thimonier Eeva-Stiina Tuittila Juha-Pekka Tuovinen Patrik Vestin Gaëlle Vincent Caroline Vincke Domenico Vitale Peter Waldner Per Weslien Lisa Wingate Georg Wohlfahrt Mark Zahniser Timo VesalaAbstract
Research infrastructures play a key role in launching a new generation of integrated long-term, geographically distributed observation programmes designed to monitor climate change, better understand its impacts on global ecosystems, and evaluate possible mitigation and adaptation strategies. The pan-European Integrated Carbon Observation System combines carbon and greenhouse gas (GHG; CO2, CH4, N2O, H2O) observations within the atmosphere, terrestrial ecosystems and oceans. High-precision measurements are obtained using standardised methodologies, are centrally processed and openly available in a traceable and verifiable fashion in combination with detailed metadata. The Integrated Carbon Observation System ecosystem station network aims to sample climate and land-cover variability across Europe. In addition to GHG flux measurements, a large set of complementary data (including management practices, vegetation and soil characteristics) is collected to support the interpretation, spatial upscaling and modelling of observed ecosystem carbon and GHG dynamics. The applied sampling design was developed and formulated in protocols by the scientific community, representing a trade-off between an ideal dataset and practical feasibility. The use of open-access, high-quality and multi-level data products by different user communities is crucial for the Integrated Carbon Observation System in order to achieve its scientific potential and societal value.