Hopp til hovedinnholdet

Division of Food Production and Society

The role of diversified small-scale horticulture in a transition towards more sustainable food systems with healthier diets (SmallHort)

Sabine Henlin-Strømme selger grønnsaker på Bondens Marked i Bergen. Photo: Anna Birgitte Milford
Active Last updated: 02.03.2026
End: feb 2029
Start: feb 2025

The aim of the project is to explore how food systems based on diversified small-scale horticulture can be developed to become more economically, socially and environmentally sustainable while also increasing in scale. This will provide benefits to nature, environment and public health.

Status Active
Start - end date 03.02.2025 - 04.02.2029
Project manager Anna Birgitte Milford
Division Division of Food Production and Society
Department Economics and Society
Partners Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture, Western Norway Institute of Applied Sciences, Telemark Research Institute, Veterinærinstituttet, Norges Vel, Lystgården, County Governor of Vestland, Organic Norway, Holt Økopark
Total budget 12 000 000 NOK
Funding source Norwegian Research Council

The project involves diversified small-scale horticulture either run by farmers (e.g. market gardens) or as an organized collaboration between consumers (e.g. allotment gardens). The project focuses on both rural and urban areas and has an interdisciplinary approach that involves both social and natural sciences.

The four work packages in the project are all centred around small-scale horticulture and focus on the following themes: sustainability in cultivation and distribution (WP1), increased consumption of vegetables and fruit (WP2), social networks (WP3) and safe composting methods for organic waste (WP4). Data in the form of in-depth interviews and observations will be collected in five different regions in Norway. Surveys will be conducted with farmers and consumers of small-scale horticultural products. Other methods used are participatory action research, qualitative sustainability assessment, insect sampling using traps, intervention study with consumers, participant observation, composting trials with sub/optimal conditions, and chemical plus microbiological analysis. The project will benefit from collaboration and knowledge exchange with researchers from INRAE, France, who have experience in market gardening research.

Actors from public authorities and voluntary organizations working with small-scale horticulture will contribute as discussion partners, co-organisers, in data collection, and with dissemination of research results.

The project aims to provide results in the form of recommendations and advice on cultivation practices and organizational models with environmental, social, economic and health benefits.

Publications in the project

To document

Abstract

Problemsstillingene i prosjektet har vært: - Hva kjennetegner produksjon, salg og markedsføring hos markedshagedyrkere? - Hvilke faktorer påvirker lønnsomheten til markedshagedyrkere med spesielt fokus på valgte salgskanaler, markedsføring og hvorvidt økologisk sertifisert? Hva er deres utfordringer og pla-ner framover? - Hvordan oppleves fordeler og ulemper med økologisk sertifisering? - Hvordan samarbeider markedshagedyrkerne med andre produsenter og aktører? - Hvordan kan utvikling i samarbeid, virkemidler og annen støtte bidra til å styrke småskala grønnsaksproduksjon?

Abstract

Food self-sufficiency and local food production are increasingly important in the context of global supply chain uncertainty. In Northern Norway, sustaining agricultural activity is central to national food preparedness, yet vegetable production in Arctic municipalities remains limited. In this study, we examine how vegetable production can be enhanced in Nordreisa municipality by exploring barriers, opportunities, and stakeholder perspectives. Using a qualitative single-case study design, we investigate local realities that shape the current lack of vegetable production through semi-structure interviews with diverse stakeholders across the regional food system and a local interest in vegetable production survey. We found that systemic barriers such as limited infrastructure, fragmented markets, and governance gaps constrain immediate growth. At the same time, motivated producers, consumer interest in local food, and a shared desire for self-sufficiency indicate a latent potential for development. This study suggests that increasing local vegetable production requires a dual approach: grassroots initiatives that mobilize local actors and supportive governance that enables implementation. Practical measures include the establishment of local storage and distribution facility, fostering collaboration between producers and consumers, and aligning municipal and national policies with local capacities. Through the enhancement of social networks and institutional support, municipalities like Nordreisa can take concrete steps towards strengthened local vegetable production.

Abstract

Although community supported agriculture (CSA) is generally considered a potent alternative to the globalized food system, the capacity of CSA farms to foster community support in agriculture has been questioned due to low engagement of members at the farm and high member turnover rates. In this study, I consider the case of member-driven CSA farms and explore the potential of this CSA model to increase member engagement in CSA farming. Using an inductive, phenomenon-first approach to research, I compare the cases of four Norwegian member-driven CSA farms to describe how they engage members at the farm and explore the factors influencing member engagement. The on-farm participant observation, focus group interviews with farm coordinators and members survey revealed that Norwegian member-driven CSAs significantly engage members in all aspects of the farm operations. Yet, the differences observed between cases showed that member engagement depend on the capacity of the farm to create the right conditions for collaboration. Although the member-driven model has the potential to increase member engagement in CSA farming, the preferences of members, the opinions and engagement of coordinators, the size of the farm, the number of years of operation and the external support received by the farm, are five factors that affect the capacity of the CSA farm to collaborate with members. Ultimately, this study concludes that achieving community engagement in member-driven CSAs depends less on their organizational model and more on the specific conditions that facilitate collaboration and member engagement.