Jorunn Børve
Research Scientist
(+47) 958 78 057
jorunn.borve@nibio.no
Place
Ullensvang
Visiting address
NIBIO Ullensvang, NO-5781 Lofthus
Biography
My main research topic is plant pathology related to fruit growing. My researcher carrier started with a PhD about fungal fruit decay in sweet cherries. Later on it has been a wider focus with fruit rot on apple, plum and sweet cherry fruits in addition to important diseases on the trees such as European canker and bacterial canker. The research is done in cooperation with the fruit industry and related industries such as packinghouses and nurseries.
Authors
Jorunn Børve Theresa Weigl Emily Follett Ingunn Øvsthus H. Larsen Torbjørn Haukås E. Indergård S.F. Remberg Dalphy Ondine Camira Harteveld Arne StensvandAbstract
Evaluating the effect of different treatments after a simulated shelf life is common in postharvest industry experiments. As fungal fruit decay development is closely linked to preharvest factors, fruit quality, and postharvest treatments two other time points were added in recent experiments. When commercial packinghouses graded the different experimental units (from 1 to 4 bins) they made three different samples; 1) all the fruit manually discarded before size grading (mostly external symptoms of fungal fruit decay and physiological disorders), 2) a 100-fruit sample of the fruit not regarded as first class by the grading machine at size grading (fruit that could be used for industry purpose, processing fruit), and 3) packed fruit for shelf life testing. As expected, differences in pathogen presence were found varying with storage time, cultivar, season, treatments, etc., but overall, some important factors could be pointed at: up to 70% of the processing fruit had damages (caused by insects, weather or mechanical damage) that could be an entry point of fungal pathogens in storage. Apple scab was found on up to 60% of that fruit and up to 12% of the graded fruit in shelf-life tests, indicating a less effective fungicide strategy in some of the commercial orchards. The additional knowledge gained by having three sample types in the experiments is discussed.
Authors
Wiktoria Kaczmarek-Derda Trygve S. Aamlid Ingerd Skow Hofgaard Tatsiana Espevig Khaled Murad Agha Anette Sundbye Zahra Bitarafan Kirsten Tørresen Heidi Udnes Aamot Andrea Ficke Gunda Thöming Annette Folkedal Schjøll Håvard Eikemo Anne Muola Therese With Berge Belachew Asalf Tadesse Jorunn Børve Arne Stensvand Nina Trandem Gunnhild Jaastad Bjørn Arild Hatteland Katherine Ann Gredvig Nielsen Nina Johansen Charles Kwadha Inger Sundheim Fløistad Martin Pettersson Zhibo Hamborg Carl Jonas Jorge Spetz Dag-Ragnar Blystad Özgün Candan Onarman Umu Marit Skuterud Vennatrø Jan Philip Øyen Solveig Haukeland Tor-Einar Skog Roger Holten Anne Straumfors Valborg Kvakkestad Line Ulberg Tveiten Ingrid FlatlandAbstract
I Jordbruksoppgjøret 2025 (Prp. 149 S (2024 – 2025)) ble det enighet om at kunnskapsstatus og -behov innen plantehelseområdet fra 2019 måtte oppdateres. Det er gjort i form av denne rapporten. Den bestilte utredningen er avgrenset til skadegjørere og planteverntiltak som er relevante for jord- og hagebruk. Utredingen tar for seg kunnskap, prosjekter og kunnskapshull siden 2019 og fram til i dag (2026). Kapittel 1 omtaler metodebruk og plantevern i et beredskapsperspektiv. Kapittel 2.1-2.8 omhandler status for utfordringer med skadegjørere og tilgang til planteverntiltak for alle aktuelle plantekulturer for ugras, skadedyr og sopp. Kapittel 2.9 gir en oversikt over godkjente og utgåtte plantevernmidler siden 2019. Kapittel 2.10 omhandler skadegjørere hvor kjemiske plantevernmidler er i begrenset bruk. Det vil si virus, bakterier og nematoder. Kapittel 3 tar for seg ny teknologi og innovative metoder for integrert plantevern og faktorer som påvirker bruken av disse. Kapittel 4 omhandler miljø- og helseeffekter knyttet til bruk av kjemiske plantevernmidler, hvilke plantekulturer som utgjør størst risiko for negative miljøeffekter og faktorer som reduserer helserisikoen. Kapittel 5 tar for seg næringens behov og utviklingstrekk knyttet til kunnskap, rådgivning og tiltak. Dette kapittelet ser også på årsaker til eventuelle endringer i bruk av og behov for plantevernmidler som følge av for eksempel miljøkrav.
Abstract
In Norway, plum fruit is sold for fresh consumption in a similar way as sweet cherry for a high price. Different treatments were tested to ensure high quality at the consumer end. The fruit is normally picked with a range in ripeness. At packaging grading the fruit in different maturity classes for intended sale in shorter (Ripe+) and longer channels (Ripe-) has been partially implemented in the industry. As a further improvement, application of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) was tested on fruit of the two ripeness categories of two cultivars. After a period of cold storage and simulated shelf-life for two days at 20°C fruits were tasted by a sensory panel. Fruit quality and fungal decay were assessed both after cold storage and simulated shelf-life. It was clear that taste of less ripe fruit was associated with firmer fruit, more acidity and greener taste, and quality of riper fruit was associated with sweetness, higher colour value, softer texture and a higher taste intensity. The panel found that treated Ripe- fruit had a greener taste and flavour and were less juicy and less sweet. In general, quality analysis of less ripe plum fruit of both cultivars showed that they had higher content of acids, were firmer, and had less cover colour after storage compared to riper fruits. Also, treatment with 1-MCP impacted firmness, colour, and acidity. However, the treatment effect was different depending on cultivars and years. In 2022, the effect of 1-MCP was seen for both ripeness categories of ‘Reeves’, but only for Ripe- fruit in 2023. There was no effect of 1-MCP treatments on ‘Mallard’ in 2022, however, there was a slight effect of 1-MCP on firmness, acids and cover colour after self-life test for less ripe plum fruit in 2023. The Ripe+ fruit developed 2-10 times more fungal fruit decay than less ripe fruit. 1-MCP had no effect on development of fungal fruit decay. Preliminary conclusion was that management of fruit maturation is more effective than 1-MCP application in securing consumer end quality.